Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, confirmed as co-host of Junior MasterChef Australia
Unbiased summary
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, has been announced as a co-host of Junior MasterChef Australia for its 2027 season, alongside Poh Ling Yeow. The announcement was made by Paramount Australia/Network 10. Meghan previously appeared as a guest judge on MasterChef Australia in April 2025, which the network said drew its largest Sunday audience since 2023. In a statement, Meghan said she 'can't wait' to return. Filming is expected to take place in Melbourne over several weeks in early to mid-2027, and it is unclear whether her family will accompany her or if she will be paid. The news coincides with reports that Meghan's estranged father, Thomas Markle Sr, has been accused of possessing child sexual abuse images, which he denies.
Generated with deepseek-flash (DeepSeek)
Coverage by outlet
The Guardian
left
Angle
Frames the story as a straightforward career move for Meghan, giving prominence to her own positive statements and the show's success.
Bias
The Guardian focuses on the uncontroversial details of the TV role, including Meghan's quotes and the network's ratings claim. It mentions the allegations against Thomas Markle only briefly at the end, without detailing the nature of the accusations or Meghan's response. This downplays the controversy and presents a largely promotional tone.
The Mirror
centre-left
Angle
Adopts an enthusiastic, celebrity-focused tone that highlights Meghan's excitement and the logistics of her stay in Australia.
Bias
The Mirror emphasizes Meghan's 'can't wait' quote and speculates about her family visiting, framing the story as an exciting adventure. It omits any mention of the allegations against her father, presenting only the positive aspects of the announcement. The coverage is upbeat and lacks balance regarding the surrounding controversy.
BBC News
centre-left
Angle
Provides a factual report but prominently links the TV role to the serious allegations against Meghan's father, framing it as part of a broader scrutiny of Meghan.
Bias
The BBC includes details about the allegations and Meghan's broken contact with her father, which are not directly part of the TV announcement. It also notes that Meghan was not paid for her previous appearance and raises the question of payment for the new role. This emphasis shifts the focus from the TV news to the controversy, potentially coloring the story with a more critical lens.
The Independent
centre-left
Angle
Separates the TV role from the allegations but offers extensive coverage of the controversy in related articles, emphasizing the seriousness of the accusations and police failures.
Bias
The Independent's primary article on the TV role is brief and includes a mention of the allegations, but the outlet provides multiple in-depth pieces on the allegations, including details about the Met Police's handling and a former police chief's criticism. This extensive coverage amplifies the controversy, while the TV announcement itself is reported with less prominence. The overall effect is to keep the scandal in the foreground.
GB News
right
Angle
Presents the TV role in a positive, almost promotional manner, focusing on Meghan's quotes and the show's details without mentioning the allegations.
Bias
GB News mirrors much of the Mirror's upbeat coverage but goes further by omitting any reference to the controversy, instead highlighting supportive statements from sources. It does not provide context about Meghan's father or the police investigation, resulting in a one-sided, favorable portrayal of the announcement.
Daily Mail
right
Angle
Uses a sensationalist tone, framing Meghan's move as a 'from royalty to reality TV' career shift and speculating about her family's relocation, while also covering the allegations in a separate article.
Bias
The Daily Mail emphasizes the perceived downgrade from royalty to reality TV and includes speculative details about the Sussexes' international lifestyle. It does not mention the allegations in the main article, but a separate piece covers the Met Police's mishandling of the letter, focusing on the scandal's sensational aspects. This split treatment allows the outlet to promote both a narrative of Meghan's career decline and the seriousness of the allegations, depending on the article.