Newshash
2026-10-25
Viewing archive: 2026-10-25 Back to today
← All stories

Met Police confirm 2019 letter on Thomas Markle allegations; did not share with other agencies

Unbiased summary

The Metropolitan Police confirmed it received a letter in January 2019 containing allegations of offending outside the UK involving Thomas Markle, the estranged father of the Duchess of Sussex. The letter was passed to the Duke and Duchess's office but not shared with other law enforcement agencies. Meghan said she was made aware of the 'disturbing allegations' and was assured they were being investigated. Philippine authorities are investigating claims that Markle possessed child sexual abuse images at his former home, allegations he denies. The Met is reviewing its handling and considering referral to the IOPC. Thomas Markle has admitted paying for sex in the Philippines but denies underage involvement.

Generated with deepseek-flash (DeepSeek)

Coverage by outlet
The Guardian left
Angle Straightforward news report focusing on the Met's admission and the Duchess's statement, with minimal sensationalism.
Bias The Guardian sticks largely to the facts, quoting the Met's statement and Meghan's response. It does not prominently feature Thomas Markle's denial beyond a brief mention, but overall provides a balanced account without significant deviation.
The Independent centre-left
Angle Centre-left coverage that emphasises the Met's failure to share information and highlights the Duchess's distress, while also detailing the allegations and denials.
Bias The Independent slightly frames the Met's admission as 'astonishing' and gives prominence to Meghan's statement. It includes Thomas Markle's denial but focuses more on the procedural failure and the Duchess's perspective, though it remains largely factual.
BBC News centre-left
Angle Centrist coverage that prioritises the Duchess's letter to her father and the Met's handling, with additional details from the Philippine investigation and Markle's interview.
Bias BBC News provides a balanced account, including Meghan's letter, the Met's actions, and Markle's denial and admission. It does not stray far from objectivity, though it leads with the personal letter angle, which may add emotional weight.
i Paper centre
Angle Concise, factual report centred on the Met's statement and the Philippine investigation, with minimal editorialising.
Bias I Paper provides a neutral summary, quoting the Met and noting Markle's denial. It does not emphasise any particular angle and largely adheres to the objective facts without notable deviation.
Daily Mail right
Angle Right-leaning outlet that sensationalises the story, focusing on Meghan's past statements, Thomas Markle's admissions, and the Met's delay, while casting doubt on the allegations' timing and motives.
Bias The Daily Mail deviates significantly by questioning Meghan's credibility (highlighting her 'Daddy's Girl' comment), emphasising Thomas Markle's confession to paying for sex, and suggesting a feud-driven motive. It downplays the seriousness of the allegations against Markle and amplifies scepticism about the Duchess's account.
GB News right
Angle Right-leaning coverage that briefly notes the Met's admission and highlights the timeline discrepancy in Meghan's account.
Bias GB News focuses on the Met's confirmation and the Duchess's mistaken timeline, giving space to her spokesman's explanation. It does not delve into Thomas Markle's admission or the sensational details, but its emphasis on the discrepancy subtly undermines Meghan's credibility.