'Glaring gaps' in UK's High North military leave Brits and nuclear deterrent vulnerable to Russia

'Glaring gaps' in UK's High North military leave Brits and nuclear deterrent vulnerable to Russia Britain is dangerously exposed in the High North to Kremlin spy ships and espionage as tension mount between the UK and Russia, MPs are warned 'Glaring gaps’ in the UK’s military strength in the High North could leave Brits, our nuclear deterrent and crucial subsea pipelines vulnerable to Russian attacks, MPs have warned. The Commons Defence Committee said "dramatic progress" is needed in building up UK armed forces and ships in the strategically important region by 2030. That is the time when former prime minister Sir Keir Starmer predicted Moscow could attack NATO. The region including Northern Norway, Sweden, Finland, Svalbard, and the Barents and Greenland seas is increasingly the focus for Kremlin spy ships. To see more of the stories you love from The Mirror and to find them easily in Google then make us your preferred source. Free and easy-to-do, just click on the link here to find more from The Mirror at the top of your feed. And the alert went up as increasingly Europe is doubting US support for the NATO alliance. Failing to defend the region could leave underwater cables and pipelines carrying key data and energy to the UK exposed to sabotage during peacetime, the committee said. In the event of conflict, it said Russia could threaten the UK's population, civilian and military infrastructure and vital Atlantic supply routes from the US. In a report, the MPs highlighted a shortfall in anti-submarine warfare at a time when the greatest Russian threat comes from maritime sabotage teams. The best deterrent is the Royal Navy's anti-submarine warships and nuclear-powered submarines, but these are ageing and often out of action under maintenance. There are currently five Type 23 frigates, which track down hostile submarines and protect the UK's nuclear weapons, and six Type 45 destroyers in service - just over half of the Royal Navy's requirement for 19 vessels. Eight new Type 26 frigates will eventually take over, but with construction slow, the Defence Committee urged ministers to ensure that none of the remaining ones leaves service in the meantime. The committee's inquiry also heard of "a shockingly low availability" of submarines, and that the UK appeared to have temporarily lost its ability to operate them beneath Arctic ice. This would allow Russia in a conflict to conceal its nuclear submarines under the ice unchallenged while its attack submarines surge forward. Committee chairman Tan Dhesi said: "The High North poses a major strategic challenge for the UK's security. This is a demanding, hostile environment, and one that our greatest adversary, Russia, is seeking to dominate for military advantage. "The UK needs to be willing to address a hard truth: it does not currently have all the capabilities to operate successfully in the High North. "Russian submarine and sabotage forces in the High North pose direct risks to the North Atlantic and the UK, including the nuclear deterrent. Despite this, the Ministry of Defence has accepted a serious anti-submarine warfare gap. "Publicly available evidence of low availability among destroyers, frigates and attack submarines calls into question whether the UK can meet its commitments in the High North. "And if the UK Government means what it says - that Russia could attack Nato as soon as 2030 - then work to rectify these vulnerabilities cannot start soon enough." The committee also questioned whether the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF), a UK-led military coalition of northern European nations, should focus more on threats in the High North rather than maintaining the same level of activity in the Baltic region. Mr Dhesi urged ministers to consider this "particularly if the UK has to plan for uncertainty over US support for Nato". And to offset the effects of any greater Jef focus on the High North, the UK may need to consider bolstering the current British Army force in the Baltics, notably in Estonia, he said. The Kremlin is seeking to exploit the High North, loosely defined as the Arctic and parts of the North Atlantic, for minerals and for control over shipping routes as melting sea ice makes them more accessible. The Ministry of Defence has been contacted for comment.