Newshash
2026-10-18
Viewing archive: 2026-10-18 Back to today
← All stories

Trump pauses new Russia sanctions days before they take effect, drawing criticism from Zelensky and US lawmakers

Unbiased summary

US President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Friday pausing a new package of sanctions against Russia that had been passed by Congress and signed into law in September. The sanctions, named after the late Senator Lindsey Graham, would have imposed tariffs of up to 100% on imports from major buyers of Russian oil and gas, including China and India, and targeted Russian officials, banks, and the shadow fleet. Trump said the 60-day pause was in the national interest to assess economic impact. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky criticised the move as a reward for Vladimir Putin, while some US lawmakers from both parties condemned it. The decision followed a controversial US deal to import Russian diesel and came as Russia launched a major strike on Ukraine's energy infrastructure.

Generated with deepseek-flash (DeepSeek)

Coverage by outlet
The Guardian left
Angle Frames Trump's sanctions pause as a dangerous concession that emboldens Putin and undermines Ukraine, amplifying Zelensky's condemnation.
Bias The Guardian leads with Zelensky's 'reward' quote and emphasises the timing of the pause alongside a severe Russian attack on power plants, omitting details such as Rubio's explanation of a 60-day review. It downplays the stated rationale for the pause and highlights Zelensky's warning that more sanctions relief will follow, portraying the move as part of a broader US-Russia alignment.
BBC News centre-left
Angle Presents a balanced account of the sanctions suspension but frames it within an escalating diplomatic row, noting both criticism and the administration's rationale.
Bias BBC includes factual details such as the 60-day pause and Rubio's statement about analysing economic impact, providing more context than some outlets. It reports Zelensky's criticism and the Russian envoy's praise without adopting a strongly partisan tone, though it emphasises the 'row' between Trump and Zelensky and the 'backlash' from lawmakers.
i Paper centre
Angle Explains the sanctions pause in a neutral, explanatory manner, contextualising it with recent events and detailing the sanctions' provisions.
Bias I Paper provides a relatively straightforward account, including the 60-day waiver and the sanctions' scope, and notes Zelensky's criticism and Russia's strike on energy facilities. It avoids strong editorialising but uses the phrase 'symbolic boost for Russia' as a subheading, which subtly frames the move as beneficial to Moscow. It also mentions Trump's call for Zelensky's removal, adding context without excessive emphasis.
Daily Mail right
Angle Adopts a critical stance toward Trump, focusing on accusations of 'sucking up to Putin' and betrayal, while highlighting bipartisan condemnation and Ukrainian suffering.
Bias The Daily Mail emphasises Republican Congressman Don Bacon's quote calling the move a 'surrender' and 'betrayal', and stresses the deadly Russian attack on Ukraine. It omits the administration's rationale for the 60-day pause (such as Rubio's explanation) and frames the sanctions waiver as a 'U-turn' that prolongs the war, using stronger emotive language like 'sucking up to Putin' in the headline.