VAR officials stood down after Manchester derby error over Haaland goal

Unbiased summary

Manchester City beat Manchester United 2-1 at Old Trafford on Sunday, with Erling Haaland scoring the winning goal in the 60th minute. The goal was initially disallowed for offside but awarded after VAR review, as Haaland was ruled onside by United defender Patrick Dorgu's boot. However, Pro Ref later acknowledged an 'error of judgement' because City midfielder Enzo Fernandez, in an offside position, attempted to play the ball and should have triggered an on-field review. The VAR officials, Matt Donohue and Blake Antrobus, have been stood down from this weekend's Premier League fixtures. The decision was made by Howard Webb, chief refereeing officer. Pro Ref has contacted Manchester United to explain the mistake. City played with 10 men after Phil Foden's red card but maintained their perfect start to the season.

Generated with deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 (NIM)

Coverage by outlet

The Guardian left

Angle Frames the incident as a broader debate about the difficulty of refereeing and the reliance on technology, while noting similar controversial decisions in other matches.

Bias The Guardian's coverage in the podcast title and description emphasizes the 'controversial' nature and questions if referees need 'Nasa scientists or data wonks.' The standalone news article focuses on the officials being stood down but places it in context of Pro Ref's 'error of judgment' and the technical failure to spot Fernandez's interference. It omits any suggestion of deliberate bias or incompetence beyond the admitted error, and downplays the impact on Manchester United by presenting it as part of a wider refereeing debate.

VAR controversy decides Manchester derby as City keep pace with Arsenal: Football Weekly – podcast

VARs who wrongly confirmed Haaland’s goal at Manchester United are stood down

BBC News centre-left

Angle Presents the story as a straightforward factual report on the officials' removal, with balanced context from Pro Ref's statement.

Bias BBC's coverage is largely neutral, directly quoting Pro Ref's explanation and noting the subjective nature of the offside call. It includes the relevant details (Fernandez's position, the initial on-field decision) without hyperbole. It does not speculate on future appointments or add emotive language. Compared to the Daily Mail, it omits any suggestion of 'blocking' officials from United matches, sticking only to confirmed facts. The angle is informational, with no evident narrative push beyond standard reporting.

No weekend game for Manchester derby VAR officials

Daily Mail right

Angle Frames the incident as a 'fiasco' caused by 'blundering' officials, emphasizing alleged future restrictions on United matches and implying deeper incompetence.

Bias The Daily Mail uses loaded terms like 'Blundering' and 'staggering decision' and claims the pair are 'set to be BLOCKED' from working on United matches, citing unnamed sources—a detail not confirmed in other reports. It emphasizes 'damage limitation mode' and the 'stunned Old Trafford' atmosphere, amplifying the sense of injustice for Manchester United. It omits the nuance that the error was a misapplication of subjective offside criteria and focuses on the supposed punishment. The coverage strays from neutral by adding speculative and emotive framing, making the officials appear negligent rather than mistaken.

Blundering Manchester derby VAR officials set to be BLOCKED from working on Man United matches after being stood down for 'error of judgement' in allowing Erling Haaland's offside winner to stand