Newshash
2026-09-14
Viewing archive: 2026-09-14 Back to today
← All stories

Refereeing body admits error in awarding Haaland's winning goal for Man City at Man United

Unbiased summary

In the 60th minute of the Manchester derby at Old Trafford, Erling Haaland scored for Manchester City, initially ruled offside but overturned by VAR. The video assistant ruled Haaland onside and determined that Enzo Fernández, in an offside position, did not interfere with play. Manchester United argued Fernández's positioning and dive distracted defenders, impacting the play. Pro Ref, the refereeing body, later admitted an error of judgement, stating VAR should have recommended an on-field review. They contacted Manchester United to acknowledge the mistake and said a review would take place. Manchester City won 1-0 despite playing with 10 men after Phil Foden's red card. United manager Michael Carrick and defender Lisandro Martínez expressed frustration with the decision.

Generated with deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 (NIM)

Coverage by outlet
The Guardian left
Angle Focuses on the official admission of error and the procedural failure of VAR, framing it as a clear officiating mistake.
Bias Emphasizes Pro Ref's admission and the 'error of judgement' phrase, and includes Carrick's criticism. Downplays the match context (Foden's red card) and omits any fan reaction or broader controversy. Stays close to the official statements but gives weight to the United perspective.
BBC News centre-left
Angle Presents a balanced factual report, highlighting the controversy and including multiple perspectives (Pro Ref, United players) without overt editorializing.
Bias Provides context of Foden's red card and the match result, and explains the offside debate. It includes quotes from Martínez and Carrick, and notes the review. Does not speculate beyond the official statement, maintaining a neutral tone, but slight emphasis on United's sense of injustice.
The Sun right
Angle Sensationalizes the story as a major injustice, using emotive language and suggesting deeper problems with VAR, including conspiracy undertones.
Bias Headlines and text use strong words like 'MISTAKE' and 'something's seriously off'. Emphasizes the shock and anger, includes Gary Neville's criticism, and quotes Martínez's strong reaction. Omits the match context of City playing with 10 men, and frames the error as further proof of systemic failure. More opinionated and dramatic than neutral.
Daily Mail right
Angle Diverts focus from the officiating to a celebrity sideline incident, treating the game's controversy as secondary to a 15-year-old's gesture.
Bias Leads with Noel Gallagher's son's middle fingers, giving significant coverage to a tangential story. The match error is mentioned only as background. This downplays the actual officiating error and the implications for the sport, instead prioritizing tabloid-style content. Strays far from the core facts by ignoring in-depth analysis of the decision.