Newshash
2026-09-11
Viewing archive: 2026-09-11 Back to today
← All stories

English mayors get uncapped tourist tax powers; hospitality warns of job losses

Unbiased summary

The UK government announced on Thursday that mayors in England will be given powers to impose a visitor levy on overnight accommodation, charged as a percentage of the cost with no upper limit. The plan, presented by Local Government Secretary Angela Rayner, was welcomed by some regional mayors as a new revenue source. Hospitality industry figures protested, with trade body UK Hospitality warning of potential job losses and a £2bn economic impact. However, after meeting with mayors, Labour's ten metro mayors voluntarily pledged to cap the levy at 5% if they apply it, citing a balance between local variation and avoiding excessive charges. The government said the levy would fund local services. The policy is set to be detailed further by early 2028.

Generated with deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 (NIM)

Coverage by outlet
The Guardian left
Angle Critical of the government's uncapped tourist tax, highlighting industry backlash and lack of controls.
Bias The Guardian emphasises the unconditional nature of the tax and the industry's outrage, quoting business owners and predicting severe job losses. It omits the later voluntary cap by Labour mayors, presenting the policy as more damaging than final negotiations suggest. It does include Rayner's defence, but the overall frame is supportive of the industry's concerns.
The Independent centre-left
Angle Presents the tax as an unlimited power granted by Burnham, with a mix of industry criticism and government defence.
Bias The Independent repeats the inaccurate attribution to Burnham ('Andy Burnham to hand') and emphasises the 'unlimited' nature. It includes both sides but omits the later voluntary cap, potentially overstating the risk. The article does note government sources saying mayors are unlikely to set too high, but still frames it as a concern.
BBC News centre-left
Angle Neutral report focusing on the mayors' voluntary cap pledge, balancing industry concerns with government and mayoral responses.
Bias BBC News includes the key development of the voluntary 5% cap, which other outlets omitted, and notes the opposition from Reform and Conservative mayors. It reports facts without editorialising and includes both industry warnings and government justifications. The deviation from neutrality is minimal, though it may give more weight to the mayors' reassurances than to industry fears.
City AM centre-right
Angle Focused on the negative business impact of the uncapped levy, portraying it as an unjustified burden on hospitality.
Bias City Am refers to 'Andy Burnham's government', incorrectly implying Burnham is in charge, and uses emotive language like 'blast'. It highlights the lack of an upper cap and quotes industry criticism, but omits the mayors' voluntary cap and any positive reception from local leaders. The tone is alarmist, aligning with centre-right pro-business perspective.
Daily Mail right
Angle A strongly opinionated attack on the Labour policy, framing it as disastrous for families and the economy.
Bias The Daily Mail uses hyperbolic and subjective language ('delusional, unforgivable, unsurvivable') and editorialises extensively. It blames Burnham (incorrectly) and ties the tax to other Labour policies and social issues like immigration. It omits any support for the levy, including the mayors' voluntary cap and the government's rationale. The coverage is heavily right-wing biased and lacks neutrality.