Newshash
2026-06-20
Viewing archive: 2026-06-20 Back to today
← All stories

Starmer faces mounting pressure to resign after Burnham wins Makerfield by-election with large majority

Unbiased summary

Andy Burnham won the Makerfield by-election with approximately 55% of the vote, beating Reform UK on around 35%. Following the result, a number of Cabinet ministers including Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, and previously Ed Miliband and Shabana Mahmood, have urged Starmer to set a timetable for his departure. Starmer has refused to resign, stating he will not 'walk away' and will fight any leadership contest, while warning against plunging the country 'into chaos'. He spent Friday calling Cabinet ministers to gauge support. Burnham is expected to travel to London on Monday to meet MPs. Some Labour figures are hoping for a coronation rather than a full contest. Starmer is reportedly spending the weekend with family considering his position. A key moment is expected at Tuesday's Cabinet meeting.

Generated with Claude Sonnet 4.6

Coverage by outlet
Morning Star left
Angle Burnham's victory is presented as a clear popular mandate that obligates Starmer to immediately quit, framing his departure as settled and overdue.
Bias The Morning Star presents union and MP demands for Starmer's resignation as definitive and unanimous, omitting any meaningful reporting of Starmer's own stated determination to fight on. It characterises Burnham's majority as a strong personal mandate for national leadership without noting the inherent limitations of a by-election result. The framing throughout treats Starmer's departure as a foregone conclusion rather than an ongoing political struggle, straying significantly from neutral reporting.
The Guardian left
Angle Starmer's position is effectively untenable and his closest allies are framing his exit as inevitable, presenting it as a matter of timing rather than outcome.
Bias The Guardian leans heavily on anonymous Cabinet sources to build a picture of near-total internal consensus that Starmer must go, using language like 'inevitable' and 'everyone thinks it is over'. This framing downplays Starmer's active resistance and the genuine uncertainty of the outcome. The piece gives significant prominence to grandees like Blunkett and Harman calling for new leadership, reinforcing the narrative of institutional momentum against Starmer, with relatively little weight given to those offering him support such as Chancellor Rachel Reeves.
The Independent centre-left
Angle Starmer is under overwhelming internal pressure and privately wavering, even as he publicly defies calls to quit.
Bias The Independent emphasises the internal Cabinet revolt and provides granular detail on individual ministers urging Starmer out, which adds useful sourcing but also amplifies the sense of collapse around him. It balances this with Starmer's own defiant statements, which keeps it closer to neutral than the Morning Star. However, characterising Burnham's win as a 'landslide' and framing Starmer as merely 'weighing his future' rather than actively resisting pressure slightly tilts the narrative toward inevitability of departure.
BBC News centre-left
Angle Starmer faces serious but contested pressure, with the outcome genuinely uncertain and key moments still ahead.
Bias The BBC's coverage is the most balanced, explicitly noting that Rachel Reeves offered Starmer 'full support' — a detail absent or underplayed in other outlets — and carefully attributing specific claims to named or clearly identified sources. It avoids characterising Starmer's departure as inevitable and frames the situation as ongoing and unresolved, pointing to Tuesday's Cabinet meeting as a future crunch point. Minor quibbles include the spokesperson quote about Alexander's call being somewhat evasive, which the BBC could have contextualised more critically.